Acne: Ordinary Illness Might Be Increased By Usage of Antibiotics for Acne

According to specialists based in last researches, the usage of antibiotics for acne

could increase common illness or diseases, what it was demonstrated by an experiment in which a cluster of individuals that was treated

with antibiotics for acne for more than six weeks (all of hem were volunteers). Once the experiment, this cluster was more than twice as

probably to develop an higher respiratory tract infection at intervals one year as people with acne who were not

treated with antibiotics.

The overuse of antibiotics, explain consultants, will lead to resistant organisms and a rise in infectious illness. There

have been, however, few studies about people who have actually been exposed to antibiotics for long periods and there the importance of

this one.

According to experts, the best folks to study

consequences of using antibiotics for acne are patients with acne (an inflammatory disease involving the sebaceous glands of the skin; characterized by papules or pustules or comedones) , who

use for long-term antibiotic therapy, representing a unique and natural population in which to study the effects of long-term

antibiotic use.

A cluster of specialists from the College of Drugs of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, identified people

diagnosed with acne between the years 1987 and 2002, aged 15 to thirty five years, during a medical database in the United Kingdom (UK).

The researchers searched data such as how often individuals were likely to determine a

physician, and compared the incidence of a typical infectious illness, upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), in individuals treated with antibiotics for acne and

those whose acne was not treated with these medications.

Specialists reported that “among the first year of observation, 15.4 percent of the patients with acne had a minimum of one

URTI, and among that year, the percentages of a URTI developing among those receiving antibiotic treatment were 2.15 times

bigger than among those that weren’t receiving antibiotic treatment”.